Squidbits – Greekgeek's Squidoo Blog Rotating Header Image

November, 2010:

The Tao of SEO

The most popular form of SEO boils down to:

  • researching popular searches related to one's topic
  • scouting the competition for those terms and one's niche
  • strategic use of keywords on a webpage and in links to that page

But "Search Engine Optimization" does not only mean keyword research, even if that's an important and powerful method. Nor does SEO only mean optimizing for Google, even if that's usually the biggest source of search engine traffic in the English-speaking world.

"Search engine optimization" simply means techniques for getting search engines to send traffic to your pages. We can talk about linkbuilding (which I don't do enough of), on-page optimization, image optimization, Squidoo tags, cross-linking -- but it all goes back to people searching for things, and finding those things on your pages.

Things.

People. Places. Objects. Nouns.

The tao of SEO is speaking in terms that someone else cares about, wants to know about, or might look for. The more concrete, specific vocabulary you use, the more likely your words may intersect with things people search for.

Don't just say you took your dog to the park. Say your dog is a labradoodle, and you take it to play frisbee at Peppergrass Park. Don't just say you like fish. Say you're crazy about ikura (salmon roe) sushi with a dab of wasabi.

Somewhere, somebody might be looking for precisely those things.

They may append certain adjectives and descriptives to the nouns: cheapest, free, unique, homemade, best, review of, top ten. But nouns are common and essential in most searches.

There is another kind of popular search besides noun-phrases: question-phrases like "how can I...?" or "what is the HTML code for...?" or "how many...?" or "how hot is...?" or "When did....?" These often make great section headers or first sentences of paragraphs.

In my creative writing, I find myself snipping out excessive use of names and description, favoring nuanced language that implies more than it says. On my Squidoo pages, I replace pronouns with nouns and say what I mean. Search engines can't read between the lines.

Of course, people can read between the lines, so you have to be careful not to overdo it. A huge mass of nouns will lose reader interest, like reading the phone book aloud. But usually, you can state the obvious in a way that's compelling to readers as well as helpful to search engines.

The tao of SEO is to find phrases that express what you want and need to say in concrete, specific ways that search engines notice. Then your pages won't just rank for one or two big keyword searches. They'll pick up all kinds of little searches, phrases that perhaps no one has ever searched before,  and that your competition has not tried to optimize for.

You can't always write concretely. Sometimes you need to write on abstract concepts, ideas, beliefs, opinions, feelings that just don't lend themselves to specific, searchable language. But when you can, state precisely what you mean. Skip filler. Skip introductions. Get to the point.

My Tier One challenge lens is puttering along…

Well, my Athena Greek mythology quiz is still puttering along. I love looking at this graph on the dashboard:Tier One Challenge Lens Stats

Its traffic is only 15-25 a day, and I'm still not sure how much of its lensrank is due to likes (although they've slowed down -- everyone who'd like it has Liked it.)  I am also wondering if the number of different referrers sending it traffic helps. I've always wondered what exactly they mean in the Squidoo FAQ by:

We look at community ratings, lensmaster reputation, clickthrough rates, frequency of updates, inbound and outbound links, revenue generated, and lots of other factors and give the lens a number.

Source Visits
Referral 93
Google 28
Direct 13
Ask 2
Yahoo 1

Every single visitor who arrived through search came with a slightly different search query. That's the on-page SEO, optimizing for related searches, and content-rich approach at work. The referrals are visits from 18 different domains, half of them image searches or Google in other countries.

As for outbound links, I've got that covered: 66 clickouts in a month, 28 clicks on 18 different links in the last week, clickthrough rate of 8%. I'm sure this is part of why a low-traffic (for tier 1) lens performs well. What I don't know is whether the lensrank algorithm counts any kind of user intereaction -- comments or taking a quiz -- as significant.

As for the whole group of 10 lenses (the challenge lens and its siblings), they've all prospered since this challenge began. All were in the 100K range with almost zero visitors and likes before. Now:

In other news, I've had 10 steady top tier lenses all month and a few more playing musical tiers with the bottom end of the tier (i.e. they're tier 1 some days but not enough to average above it. )

Tier One Challenge: We Have a Winner!

Lensmaster DinosaurEgg's Dinosaur Coloring Pages for Kids -- Raah! is the first lens in the Tier One Challenge to rise to Tier One (after never being in tier 2, as per the rules) and stay there for 30 days. Stop by to visit it and congratulate this fairly new lensmaster, who joined in late July!

I am not the expert -- DinosaurEgg is, after getting this lens to the top! But off the top of my head, I can see several components of this winning strategy:

  • Combining THREE popular niches: coloring (kids fun), education, and teachers/homeschooling resources
  • Title includes keywords for search engines, tells people exactly what's on the page, and has a little personality to draw the click!
  • Lens logo graphic is personal: it's a real kid's coloring job, messy lines and all, which gives the page so much more personality! Some studies show that a "credible" webpage logo or graphic is the most important thing in getting a visitor to look at the rest of a page
  • The introduction is short, tells what's on the page (with keywords), but again includes a personal touch: she mentions her kids using the coloring pages she's found
  • Excellent, simple CSS to make the page look good
  • Navigation system to help people find their way around the page, which also shows it's been organized in a logical way
  • Hand-picked links and resources. Forget writing lots and lots of your own content. Get people to what they want with a guarantee you've picked out good links and products!
  • Well-targeted things to sell.
  • TONS of really good links, which means a ton of clickouts.
  • Occasional personal touches throughout -- reinforced with the author's own, original assets (actual coloring examples by the author's kids)
  • PAGE BREAK MODULE: lots of closely-targeted pages means more "fishing nets" for visitors, doubling, tripling, even quadrupling traffic potential. Clickouts and sales are the bottom line, but both depend on traffic!
  • Cross-linked with a ton of other dinosaur niche lenses by the author (Yahoo site explorer sees 99 links from the rest of Squidoo.com to the page).
  • Backlinks, schmacklinks: of the 138 backlinks Squidaholic (Yahoo site explorer sees), 18 are outside of SquidU posts (mostly Squidom, lensroll, squidUtils, but one hub, and a few blog posts).
  • Weekly traffic: 438 today. You don't need thousands. You need hundreds who are willing to click and/or buy.

Well done, Dinosauregg! Thanks for the lesson in how to Squidoo!

Squidoo, Zazzle, and Creative Commons

Zazzle Referrals = Creative Commons that Earn Cash?

Last week I had a brain wave. Zazzle designs work a little like e Creative Commons: as a Zazzle Associate, you may feature them on your page or blog by providing credit and a link (in this case, a referral link) back!  You're promoting an artist's products (that's the whole point). But as a side benefit, you have access to a huge body of gorgeous graphics.

Which of course meant I had to make a lens about it:

Want Graphics? Use Zazzle Designs Like Creative Commons

(more...)

How I Got an Old Squidoo Lens from Lensrank 100,000+ to 2000

After nearly a year of lensrank 100,000+, my Tier One Challenge Lens has climbed to lensrank 1,872 today,

a month and a day after I entered it in the Tier One Challenge. Of course, getting there is step one. Holding it there for a month is the actual challenge. But I'm encouraged by the fact that it's been hanging around in the 2000 range for over a week now, and has not dipped below 3900 in 3 weeks.

Here's a quick overview of the before-and-after stats, and the chief things I did to improve it.

(more...)

Get Traffic By Designing for Visually Impaired Web Users

Enhanced web accessibility means enhanced SEO

Visually impaired users use screen readers, i.e. voice software, to browse the web. There's a lot more people surfing the web this way than you'd think. They are dependent on the text we use and the organization of web pages to help them navigate.

Search engines, too, are text-dependent. They need keywords to help them analyze page content. They need structure like headings and  image file names to tell them what each section and image is. They use words in bold, links, and certain key parts of each page to help them learn their way around.

Designing for human users and search engines often forces us to juggle two conflicting priorities: human readability versus targeting keywords. In this case, we've got a win-win situation: designing for people will help search engines get what we're trying to say.

A Squidoo Example

A Squidoo page which I just critiqued in SquidU's Critique Me forum got me to thinking about all this. It's a simple page: Funny Pie Charts. It's a collection of funny pictures. The page's author did a good job of making the page more accessible for search engines by choosing a short phrase and using it in the image's file name, alt text, and title text. (Title text is optional text that pops up when you hover your cursor over a link. You put it into  link tag like this:  <a href="link goes here" title="hover text goes here">clickable text</a>. Each image was linked back to the page it came from, so there was a place to include title text).

I suggested that the "Funny Pie Charts" author could leverage search engine traffic even more by varying the phrase in the image file name, alt text, and title text. Then I thought about people using screen readers. They won't get the jokes, because the jokes only appear in the graph itself. For example, there's a graph on "What Zombies Do" that includes "Dance with Michael Jackson".

If the alt-text for each image included the funniest two or three options from the graph, then people using screen readers could enjoy the page too. And search engines would see those words. Win!

The Long Tail, Again

If you write humor or any content with web accessibility in mind, you're chasing the long tail: that large untapped reservoir of niches, under-served target audiences, and people with special interests and intense passions who will care more about your page on wombat widgets than the huge mainstream population who read any sort of widget webpages or buy any old widgets. You may not be able to compete in the widgets market, because the widget market is saturated. There's a million widget webpages and widget producers and big-name widget brands out there. But by golly, you can compete on wombat widgets.

So write for the screen reader crowd. Give them content to read and funny pages to laugh about which they'll share and like and email to their friends. The next time you make a Lolcat, give it an alt-name that includes the caption found in the graphic, and let them enjoy the joke.

How to Design Pages for Screen Readers

How do we design for screen readers? There's a lot of good guides out there, but here's a lengthy yet incredibly information-packed Guidelines for Accessible and Usable Websites that includes all kinds of tips about how people with screen readers navigate webpages and how to shape your content to help them along.

Here's five things which we can do:

  • Use alt-text to make clear what's in a picture, especially any text in the graphic. Exception: don't waste time identifying a decorative graphic that provides no content, only a visual accent.
  • Start each paragraph, header, and link with words that give readers a clue what's in the rest of that section.
  • Establish patterns and repeat them. For example, cookbooks present recipes in the same order on every page: ingredients on the left, graphic on the right, step-by-step instructions below.
  • When possible, avoid terms that voice software is likely to mangle. Abbreviations, cute spellings, and compound words often come out funny.  For example, "homepage" gets mispronounced, so use "home page," two words. In this post, I've used "web page" and "file name" instead of running them together as I usually do.
  • Don't waste readers' time. Be brief. (Oh, I have a hard time on this one.)

Speaking of which:

THE END.

My Top Ten Suggestions for Squidoo Lenses

Have I not mentioned this lens on Squidbits? A while back I created a lens with Ten Great Ideas for Squidoo Lenses.

I'm not talking "write a lens on [insert celebrity name, dog breed, or specific product]."

I'm talking ten general areas you can use to combine what YOU know and love to write about with what OTHER people are searching for.

I'm talking ten methods that will generate lenses with a good chance of getting search traffic.

I'm talking ten ideas that will tend to get clickouts and/or sales, both of which boost lensrank.

I'm talking ways to create unique Squidoo lenses on topics that haven't been done to death, so you won't have huge competition.

I just tossed in a few edits/tweaks based on winning strategies I've observed among Top 100 List lenses.

Go look, if you haven't. This is a toolbox that should help you brainstorm.

Thad Has a Thought

(Yes, I am Thad)

I've avoided posting this because I'm afraid it might set off a kerfluffle.

But ostrich mode is boring, so.

It has always been true that a lens published mid-month will probably not earn until the next month, because however strong its launch, its average lensrank for all the days it didn't exist should be estimated as...what...? two million?  Lower than any lens that had a single visitor However, I think it was once possible to get a payout for a lens' first month of existence, if it did phenomenally well.

However, if I'm understanding Fluffanutta right -- and he knows Squidoo's guts as well as anybody -- a lens now earns nothing from the Ad Pool during its first partial month of existence, full stop. (It is eligible for affiliate sales through modules like Amazon from day one.)

This raises a question.

(more...)

Survey of Tier One Challenge Lenses (Pt. 2)

Phew! It's so easy to get caught up in your own lenses; I really admire all the generous squids who manages to make lens reviews on a weekly basis!

Before I forget: SquidooHQ recently invited us to nominate three LOTDs, and I'm delighted that my picks got featured! One lens you all know, and two you probably didn't.  (one, two, three).

But now let's get back to the Tier One Challenge. To recap, these are lenses people have never gotten above tier 3 that they're trying to get to tier one. I'm trying to review all of them. So far I've done just five. Eek!

Drifter's Traditional Books vs. eBooks

Great Stuff: Alex always uses crisp CSS to make effective-looking lenses, and I love his left-side border images. His active, engaging, eloquent language pulls you into the story, which is important on a lens that has something to say instead of just something to sell or info to offer.  He frames it as a debate, which helps convert casual web surfer into someone more mentally involved in the lens. And the content is just plain fascinating, varied, well-presented with a variety of ways to intereact with the lens. (It's also one of the few Amazon Plexos I've felt like submitting to.)

Possible Tweak: I might move the video farther down on the page. It was in danger of distracting me from the meat and main topic of the lens. Then again, it did wake me up!

RANDOM CSS TIP: Have you ever tried putting a border around the Introduction Module or a Text module, only to have the lens logo or module graphic overlap the border? I've got two techniques for dealing with the problem, which I've seen on several Challenge lenses.

(more...)