<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh No, Should I Update More Often?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2011/02/updating-lenses-lensrank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2011/02/updating-lenses-lensrank/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Blogging and Article Writing (since 1993)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greekgeek</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2011/02/updating-lenses-lensrank/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greekgeek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=1006#comment-142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dee, you are very wise. Making lenses that succeed &lt;em&gt;beyond&lt;/em&gt; Squidoo, through traffic, clicks and sales, matters more than anything one can do on Squidoo, which tends to take more manual work.

I was actually alarmed to see how much of a lensrank jump there was from updating lenses. I&#039;m relieved to see that after that initial bump, the benefit has been much less for subsequent updates. Moral: if you&#039;re lensrank chasing, update once a month, but it&#039;s not the most important thing to be worrying about.

I&#039;m getting in the habit of doing it while stuck on the phone or watching TV. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dee, you are very wise. Making lenses that succeed <em>beyond</em> Squidoo, through traffic, clicks and sales, matters more than anything one can do on Squidoo, which tends to take more manual work.</p>
<p>I was actually alarmed to see how much of a lensrank jump there was from updating lenses. I&#8217;m relieved to see that after that initial bump, the benefit has been much less for subsequent updates. Moral: if you&#8217;re lensrank chasing, update once a month, but it&#8217;s not the most important thing to be worrying about.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting in the habit of doing it while stuck on the phone or watching TV. <img src="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2011/02/updating-lenses-lensrank/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=1006#comment-140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I have a little over a third of the number of lenses you have, my aim is to get as many into the three tiers as possible, and it seems updating has some influence on that.  However, I don&#039;t feel that it is worth it for many that clearly won&#039;t get into a tier without ALOT of work being done on them, unless I have the time to do it.  Where I think updating really can be beneficial is when a lens is sitting on the border of tier 2 or 1 and constant updating could ensure it gets in there and STAYS there.  Of course, updating is only one of the factors that go into lensrank, so many of the other factors would have to be working for that lens also.  How important is constant updating to Google?  After all, Google is the one that I want to please more than the Squidoo lensrank algorithm, and I am not totally convinced that constant updating is necessary for Google.  Considering I only have one lens that gets into Tier 1, 3 or 4 in Tier 2 and around 40 - 50 in Tier 3 it is early days for me to be worrying too much about Tier payouts.  When I am getting bigger numbers in the tiers 1 and 2 then updating will be a bigger priority I am sure.  In the meantime, my time is better spent learning more SEO and building more lenses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I have a little over a third of the number of lenses you have, my aim is to get as many into the three tiers as possible, and it seems updating has some influence on that.  However, I don&#8217;t feel that it is worth it for many that clearly won&#8217;t get into a tier without ALOT of work being done on them, unless I have the time to do it.  Where I think updating really can be beneficial is when a lens is sitting on the border of tier 2 or 1 and constant updating could ensure it gets in there and STAYS there.  Of course, updating is only one of the factors that go into lensrank, so many of the other factors would have to be working for that lens also.  How important is constant updating to Google?  After all, Google is the one that I want to please more than the Squidoo lensrank algorithm, and I am not totally convinced that constant updating is necessary for Google.  Considering I only have one lens that gets into Tier 1, 3 or 4 in Tier 2 and around 40 &#8211; 50 in Tier 3 it is early days for me to be worrying too much about Tier payouts.  When I am getting bigger numbers in the tiers 1 and 2 then updating will be a bigger priority I am sure.  In the meantime, my time is better spent learning more SEO and building more lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guardianstar77</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2011/02/updating-lenses-lensrank/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guardianstar77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=1006#comment-139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do update all of my lenses frequently, but I only have 32 right now. I can imagine that it would be a full-time job with as many as you have. I&#039;ve also noticed that the updates don&#039;t hold much permanent value, unless you do it more often than once a week. Right after an update, the lensrank jumps. Within 2 or 3 days it has dropped way down again. It can be really frustrating!

I also fear that many people just click that Publish button without making any changes at all. I don&#039;t know if the algorithms are good enough to know that no change has been made on those, but I do wonder if some people don&#039;t try to get away with doing that.

It&#039;s a complex question, isn&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do update all of my lenses frequently, but I only have 32 right now. I can imagine that it would be a full-time job with as many as you have. I&#8217;ve also noticed that the updates don&#8217;t hold much permanent value, unless you do it more often than once a week. Right after an update, the lensrank jumps. Within 2 or 3 days it has dropped way down again. It can be really frustrating!</p>
<p>I also fear that many people just click that Publish button without making any changes at all. I don&#8217;t know if the algorithms are good enough to know that no change has been made on those, but I do wonder if some people don&#8217;t try to get away with doing that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a complex question, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
