Squidbits – Greekgeek's Squidoo Blog Rotating Header Image

July, 2011:

My Five Key Methods of Squidoo Success

...which aren't quite as successful as they were due to Squidoo setbacks, but that's another issue. Even so, while I'm panicking at having my Squidoo income dropping from $600 to $400 in the next month or so due to lensrank drops and recent upheavals, I have not abandoned five key methods I use for being moderately successful on Squidoo.

Most of you have seen me rant about all of these before, but I see some new Squids coming aboard who are asking "so, how do you do it?" Also, I wanted to do a self-check and see which methods I've discarded, which I'm still using. These are the clear winners:

1. Choose Topics that Meld Your Passions & the Web's

I created this diagram a while ago for Squidbits, and it still holds true:

How to Pick Topics That Get Traffic

If you write on what you love without considering your audience, people may never read it, because they may not be interested in what you have to say. But if you use the "content farm" method of looking up what people are searching for and churning out half-hearted content, they won't read it either, because your material won't satisfy them. The trick is to figure out which parts of your interests, expertise and passions overlap with what lots of people on the web care about, and then use YOUR knowledge to give them what THEY want.

To figure out what YOU know (the left side of this chart), see my Ten Suggestions for Squidoo Lenses, which is NOT a list of specific ideas, but a brainstorming aid.

To find out what THEY want, do this:

2.  Keyword Research and On-Page Optimization

See my "New Long Tail SEO" tutorial for how I research keywords before creating a new page, and how I use traffic stats on existing pages as leads to refine my content or as ideas for new articles.

3. Encourage Clickthroughs

See my "How to Get More Clicks, Sales" tutorial.

Squidoo lensrank rewards lenses that get lots of clicks and interaction, on the theory that, hopefully, they've found something useful or interesting enough to click on. Clicks aren't the only proof that your visitors have found something they like on your page, but it's hard to gauge readers' reactions unless they interact with the page in some manner.

4. Attract Visitors With Graphics

See the "attracting visitors with images" section of my Uploading Images tutorial. I love this method because it's so easy to do; you can incorporate it just like capitalization and punctuation.

5. Cross-link Related Content

Once I've landed a visitor, I try to make the most of that visitor by sending him/her to more of my content. You can't cheat by creating a virtual scavenger hunt sending visitors from one page to the next looking for real content—if you don't give visitors what they want, they leave in ten seconds or less. But if you've provided good content that your visitor likes, you have then earned his/her trust enough to recommend other related content.

You've seen one way I'm doing it in this article: when I refer to something I've talked about before, I link to it. I also make heavy use of Squidoo tags for cross-linking. And I create clusters/series of articles in the same area or niche, linking them together with fancy tables of contents, the "Featured Lenses" module, the "My Lenses" module (giving all the lenses in the cluster a unique tag), or the "Rollover Feature" trick I figured out for Squidoo.

All of These are Making the Most of One's Assets

You'll notice that I don't focus on social promotion, backlink building, or external strategies more than I absolutely must. I tweet new material, yes, but I don't submit to directories; I don't look for places to advertise my articles other than online communities where I'm active anyway.

Instead, I concentrate on maximizing my content with on-page optimization, on-page graphics, on-page links, and pointing to my other work where and when it's relevant and useful. Rather than taking time off to advertise, I spend as much time as I can making more content and enhancing existing content. This method takes time. It results a slow build-up of real, useful, interesting assets and content on a variety of subjects.

You can do this in different ways: blog posts, more articles on multiple publishing sites, even posting photos on Flickr or videos on YouTube and linking back to related lenses. (For example, see this YouTube video where I share a Magic Trick pointing to a lens that explains the trick).

The key for me is to spend my time discovering what content I have (I'll actually dig through my hard drive looking for old school papers and photos that might be seeds for a new lens), creating unique and interesting content, and hooking it up to other nodes of my ever-growing network of content.

Whch is why I kick and scream when people tamper with my content through "site improvements" or by removing the channels through which I've been sharing tips and content. (See: Squidcasts. ;) ) I do not want to have to use social media separately to promote. As much as possible, I want my content to be its own promotion! (RSS feeds are lovely for this.)

Finally, notice that this method absolutely depends on creating original, unique, interesting and/or useful content — MY content, MY passions — rather than simply collecting and curating content. Curation can be powerful and helpful, and I've got a few lenses that are simply curation lists in fancy packaging. But the majority of my lenses hook visitors with interesting and/or useful content that they won't find elsewhere.

SEO Tip: Is That the BEST You Can Do?

For obscure reasons that Glen and Janet will understand, I'm going to call this the Potato Chip Challenge.

In the past, we've learned that adding "unique" to gift-related keywords captures long-tail searches. I have also observed that the word "stuff" can collect people who are searching vaguely for interesting, er, stuff. As in "stuff about volcanoes." "Review" gets people looking for "[product name] review" before making a purchase, and as I noted in a previous post, people often search for types of products, news, movies, etc by appending the year to the search ("lcd TVs 2011").

Well, here's another to add to the list. I'd been doing it already, for some topics where keyword research suggested a match, but I hadn't consciously added it to my toolbox of pointless yet useful qualifiers: "best."  I've got Best Books on Greek Mythology, for example.

Here's the Potato Chip Challenge: Take a lens where you're reviewing several of the same kind of thing -- or even one thing, if you're really sure it's a good one -- and open its traffic stats, the detailed stats where you've got all the keywords that have brought visits to your lens. Set the time span to "90 days."

Now, open another window to edit the lens. Add "Best" to the title. Work in "best" next to the main keyword in a few places on the lens where it sounds natural. IMPORTANT: As you edit, keep an eye on your traffic stats to make sure you don't accidentally delete/screw up a phrase that's bringing you traffic.

Publish and use SquidUtils' workshop add-on to ping the updated lens.

Wait! You're not done yet. Look at the traffic stats again. Open a text document, jot down the date, and record the weekly and monthly traffic totals. Copy and paste the complete list of keywords. Save the document as "potato chip" in your Squidoo projects folder.

Come back in a month and compare traffic stats (keeping in mind that shopping-related traffic often dips in summer and rises in the fall). Hopefully, "Best [thingie]" will now be part of your lens traffic.

I don't know how successful this will be, but based on observations, it looks like an experiment worth trying. Please report results one way or the other, if you give this a try!

Hubpages, Squidoo, and Panda 2.2

Hubpages' latest strategy for dealing with Panda? Conceal its traffic data from Quantcast.

I was just checking to see how Hubpages and Squidoo are doing, following the latest tweak Panda algorithm, 2.2, which I reported on back in June.

Panda 2.2 rolled out back on June 21st. By now we've had enough traffic data that we should begin to see a bit of a before-and-after change from that. To my surprise, Hubpages has stopped letting Quantcast report its numbers. I would've expected a slight uptick from Panda 2.2, which may be the first chance Hubpages would've had to get back in Google's good graces after spam stomping. ( Panda is a special calculation done separately from ranking individual pages; it's ranking a whole domain, and that number is then applied as a boost or penalty to pages posted on the domain, like an extra ranking factor. Since the Panda calculation is only performed again when someone at Google manually punches a button, a domain has to wait to be reassessed).

So anyway. Hubpages has followed Mahalo's lead in hiding its data. A pity.

[UPDATE Aug 13: Hupbages is back on Quantcast! And I see a slight uptick after Panda 2.2. Pardon me for mentioning Mahalo and Hubpages in the same sentence; Hubpages tries to highlight quality content and stamp out spam, even if it sometimes has to mop up the mess created by unscrupulous people taking advantage of its free publishing platform. ]

So how's Squidoo holding up? I wish I could get a detailed breakdown of past years versus this year, since there's always a summertime drop. But here's the 3 year overview:

And here's the past 3 months.

Not much to tell us, but from what I can see, no drastic change from Panda 2.2.

Just as another interesting comparison, here's Suite101.com vs. Squidoo for the past six months:

Owie. Again, so far so good for the Squid, but not so happy for Suite 101, an old web 1.0 site that's got lots of good amidst the bad, from what I remember. (It probably depends on the neighborhood.)

Stay tuned for the next Panda Punch.

 

I realize some of the upheaval at Squidoo right now is, once again, Squidoo's attempt to be prepared for the next round. I think the newest layer of spam filters need some fine-tuning, and I'm anxious about the process for dealing with false positives, but I understand the need for even more aggressive spam/scraper filters.

Google Adsense on Squidoo Lenses

Are your Google ads on Squidoo wildly inappropriate? Well, that sucks.

It would be worse on your own website, where clickthroughs directly impact earnings. On Squidoo, poorly-targeted ads don't impact you quite so directly, since you're not getting paid for individual clicks. (Otherwise people might game the system.) Instead, all Adsense revenue for Squidoo lenses gets put in the monthly Ad Pool -- which also includes other advertising -- and then distributed to the 85,000 top performing lenses via payout tiers.

However, there are three reasons poorly-targeted ads on Squidoo still matter to Jane Q. Lensmaster.

  • Highly inappropriate ads may turn off readers. "I'm an abuse survivor looking for tips on how to escape a stalking ex, and the ads are for people who want to hire private detectives to snoop on their spouses. UGH!"
  • Clickouts. You want clickouts, don't you?
  • Indirectly, of course, we all benefit from more effectively targeted ads.

So, er, how does Google pick the ads for Adsense anyway? Well, as usual, I was tinkering around under the hood of a Squidoo lens, and I think I may have found the answer:

<!-- adsense setup -->
<script>
[... blah blah blah ...]
GA_googleAddAttr("cont_tag", "computer history,brief history of the internet,cern,computer history,history of web,internet history,internet map,internet timeline,tim bernerslee,web,who invented the internet,who invented the web,world wide web,www");
[... blah blah blah ...]
</script><!-- /adsense setup -->

See that "cont_tag" stuff? That's the Squidoo tags for that lens. Assuming I'm understanding the code correctly, Google is using Squidoo tags to help it pick the ads on the page, as opposed to simply analyzing the page and deciding for itself what your page is about, as it does for search. (Alternatively, Adsense may be analyzing the text on your page and combining that data with what your keywords are to pick its ads.)

If you were really trying to maximize every click, you might want to poke around in Google's Keywords Tool to find strong related keywords that advertisers are bidding for (that's the competition) and that lots of people are searching for. That tool is what many of us use for SEO, but was actually designed to help you find and choose keywords for Google Adsense.

However, we've got other stuff to worry about besides optimizing our pages for Google ads. So it's not worth your time to do it on Squidoo... unless you're getting wildly inappropriate Adsense ads. In that case, it might be worth trying Google's keywords tool to find alternative keyword phrases whose related searches seem to be more in line with what your page is about.

Unfortunately, not all ads on Squidoo lenses are Adsense: a significant number are Chitika, and they're the ones that tend to be off-base. I see a bit of code that may imply the keyword tags are used by Chitika. But on the other hand, Chitika ads are often based on what people have searched to find your page, or on local advertisers in your reader's neck of the woods. So the Chitika advertising on a Squidoo lens may not have much to do with your topic, but at least, hopefully, they have something to do with your reader.

Since the dawn of the web, I've learned most of what I know about HTML, CSS, and webpage design by checking under the hood with "View Source" (or, alternatively, through my shareware web page editor...MacOSX only, sorry) found under the "view" menu of most web browsers. I've discovered a lot of things about Squidoo this way. I don't understand everything I see, but it's fun detective work.

 

SEO Mojo: How'd He DO That?

Here's another riddle.

Google "Greatest SEO" if you don't mind somewhat strong language from a crass but knowledgeable SEO guy.
1. How'd he do that?

(Highlight for answer: Meta Description tag, which on Squidoo is supplied by the Introduction module.)

2. It's ugly as Trump's toupee, but it's effective search engine optimization. It's a tacky version of my mantra, "Make search results sexy." It stands out in a page of search results, it's liable to attract clicks, and, very importantly, it demonstrates that the website excels at what it promises: SEO.

So what can we learn from this? There are ways to do extremely powerful SEO that don't involve backlinks or promoting your site. They don't even involve keywords. They involve catching the customer's attention, proving you have and know something they're looking for, and then following through by delivering the promised content when they reach your page.

A Squidoo Riddle

Fluff is not allowed to answer this (unless he knows who's responsible for it).

For several months now, there has been a Squidoo Easter Egg on every lens that gives me flashbacks to the pre-internet of the 1980s. It's both blazingly obvious and utterly invisible. Do you know what it is?

It surprised me when it first appeared, because it was a bit of unnecessary "stuff" added at the same time that four years worth of accumulated code was tidied up and streamlined. But I suppose search engines know to skip it.

Simple Tip: Copying Google Search Links

I was a total idiot recently, wondering why my dashboard comments pane looked weird, until Fluff pointed out there was a long URL in it. (If I'd just taken care of the comment instead of sticking it on my To Do list, this would not have been a problem)!

But it illustrates an annoying problem about Google search results. Long ago, when you searched for something on Google, the Google search result page gave you the actual link of each search result. Nowadays, it throws a bunch of invisible gobbledygook into the link.

For example, if you search for "Nessie Heinrich Harder" (the name of an artist who did a painting of Nessie), you get:


The Loch Ness Monster: Nessie

www.proof-of-evolution.com/loch-ness-monster.htmlCached

Is Nessie, the Loch Ness Monster, really a plesiosaur trapped in a giant ... A plesiosaur drawn by Heinrich Harder in 1916. The weight and anatomy of a ...

 

Well, there we go. Want to share that link? You'd think you'd just right-click the clickable link, right? The part that's underlined.

WRONG! If you do that, the URL copied to your clipboard is a monster:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBgQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.proof-of-evolution.com%2Floch-ness-monster.html&ei=sEojTsnVKMrc0QG45cnEAw&usg=AFQjCNHQAvPvGAL91lnFlD5fWh06KB21Dw

Ugh. Google, why? Okay, yes, I know why. You want to track every use of Google, and possible getting people to go to Google, not bypass you. But tough. I don't wanna share that huge long link! I want the URL!

One could copy and paste the link written out under the page title:

www.proof-of-evolution.com/loch-ness-monster.html

But on Google's listing it (a) isn't a link, so you can't right-click it to grab it and (b) is missing http:// at the beginning.

So, either you have to put the http:// back in, or you click on the link, GO to the webpage, and grab its real URL from this location bar. This is a good idea in case there's a redirect. Also, you should probably not share a link without checking the page yourself  to make sure it's kosher. You never know when a page will have a horribly annoying popup or other problem your readers may not appreciate.

Keeping up with new lenses by some good lensmasters

It's no substitute for SquidCasts, but Mimi has her own personal Google Reader page keeping up with the RSS feeds of 100+ good Squidoo lensmasters. This will show new lenses by these lensmasters.

If the Nexus Tax Killed Your Amazon Associate Account

... you can change your Amazon Associates links on Squidoo to Squidoo's Amazon associates ID instead, and then get at least some commission. You know the drill: Squidoo collects about 8.5% commission due to its high volume, then pays us half of that, so you'll be making less than before (assuming you were making 6% or more). But at least it's something.

Flynn got on the ball before I did and wrote a Tutorial on How to Change Amazon Associate Links to Use Squidoo's ID. Obviously, this will only work on Squidoo, which means "eggs in one basket" syndrome all over again, and we're screwed if Amazon shuts down its New York program (where Squidoo is based).