<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Long Tail in the Age of Semantic SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2012/04/the-long-tail-in-the-age-of-semantic-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2012/04/the-long-tail-in-the-age-of-semantic-seo/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Blogging and Article Writing (since 1993)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greekgeek</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2012/04/the-long-tail-in-the-age-of-semantic-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greekgeek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 07:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=1964#comment-541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Squidoo&#039;s 90-day records of search terms help a bit, although they can&#039;t report on the search queries Google&#039;s hiding. Squidoo stats also report queries from Bing and other search engines. 

On the one hand, that muddies the waters a bit, since we don&#039;t know which search queries came from which search engine, but on the other...thank goodness we&#039;ve got a little more data than Google is giving us!

I hear you about the &quot;not reported&quot; problem, though. My Google analytics board shows that as by far and away the greatest number of searches. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Squidoo&#8217;s 90-day records of search terms help a bit, although they can&#8217;t report on the search queries Google&#8217;s hiding. Squidoo stats also report queries from Bing and other search engines. </p>
<p>On the one hand, that muddies the waters a bit, since we don&#8217;t know which search queries came from which search engine, but on the other&#8230;thank goodness we&#8217;ve got a little more data than Google is giving us!</p>
<p>I hear you about the &#8220;not reported&#8221; problem, though. My Google analytics board shows that as by far and away the greatest number of searches. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Wilson</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2012/04/the-long-tail-in-the-age-of-semantic-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 21:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=1964#comment-540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mining your traffic data is now more difficult, since G now doesn&#039;t give you the search terms used by searchers who are logged in to G. For me, that&#039;s a lot of my visitors, and quite likely, some of my major search terms... that I now don&#039;t know what they are :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mining your traffic data is now more difficult, since G now doesn&#8217;t give you the search terms used by searchers who are logged in to G. For me, that&#8217;s a lot of my visitors, and quite likely, some of my major search terms&#8230; that I now don&#8217;t know what they are <img src="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif" alt=":(" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
