<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Thoughts About Hubscore on Hubpages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2015/01/greekgeeks-thoughts-about-hubscore-on-hubpages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2015/01/greekgeeks-thoughts-about-hubscore-on-hubpages/</link>
	<description>Adventures in Blogging and Article Writing (since 1993)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:23:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine Tyrrell</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2015/01/greekgeeks-thoughts-about-hubscore-on-hubpages/comment-page-1/#comment-19197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katherine Tyrrell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=2796#comment-19197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I absolutely agree with you about the fact it&#039;s best to build content which people like and want to link to rather than trying to build links per se.

Initially there seemed to me to be no rhyme nor reason to HubScores

The conclusion I eventually came to re HubScores was that the really high ones were where they had been manually moderated, that it passed all quality assessment hub hurdles and the assessor actually liked the hub.

However that particular theory rather fell apart after I heard about how many people have had really high scoring (e.g. perfect score) hubs unpublished.

It strikes me that HubPages has some serious problems in terms of quality assessment that it very much needs to address.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely agree with you about the fact it&#8217;s best to build content which people like and want to link to rather than trying to build links per se.</p>
<p>Initially there seemed to me to be no rhyme nor reason to HubScores</p>
<p>The conclusion I eventually came to re HubScores was that the really high ones were where they had been manually moderated, that it passed all quality assessment hub hurdles and the assessor actually liked the hub.</p>
<p>However that particular theory rather fell apart after I heard about how many people have had really high scoring (e.g. perfect score) hubs unpublished.</p>
<p>It strikes me that HubPages has some serious problems in terms of quality assessment that it very much needs to address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
