<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Squidbits - Greekgeek's Squidoo Blog &#187; dashboard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/tag/dashboard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com</link>
	<description>How to Squidoo, SEO, and My Squidoo Odyssey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:49:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lensrank Factors: Pages Per Visit?</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/11/lensrank-pages-per-visit/</link>
		<comments>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/11/lensrank-pages-per-visit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greekgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Squidoo Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lensrank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My theory about Lensrank is that most Dashboard stats are used to calculate Lensrank, although we have no idea how they&#8217;re weighted. Otherwise, why is Squidoo taking up huge gobs of server time and space to crunch those numbers for hundreds of thousands of lenses each day? I have been away for a while, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My theory about Lensrank is that most Dashboard stats are used to calculate Lensrank, although we have no idea how they&#8217;re weighted. Otherwise, why is Squidoo taking up huge gobs of server time and space to crunch those numbers for hundreds of thousands of lenses each day?</p>
<p>I have been away for a while, and just noticed a third stat added to the Traffic stats for a lens:</p>
<p>Total visits: <strong>174</strong> visits             Total pageviews: <strong>256</strong> pageviews             Pages/visit: <strong>1.47</strong></p>
<p>O-ho. Squidoo&#8217;s decided pages/visit is important!</p>
<p>EDIT: Oh, but what IS pages/visit? No, it&#8217;s not how many times your visitor comes back to the page, as I had thought. Fluffanutta explains: each lens now has sub-pages aka &#8220;Module pages,&#8221; so this gives you an idea how often visitors are going to those pages as well as the main lens.</p>
<p>Lakeeerieartist has a great lens explaining <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/squidoo-module-pages">Module Pages and what they&#8217;re good for</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/11/lensrank-pages-per-visit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two More Quick Squidoo SEO Tips</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-tags-traffic-tip/</link>
		<comments>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-tags-traffic-tip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greekgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Squidoo Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lensrank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s two easy steps I do as a quick &#8220;freshness boost&#8221; for a lens about to slip past the bottom of its tier. It&#8217;s no substitute for adding new, updated, exciting content, but it&#8217;s a quick fix. In traffic stats, I change the window to 30-day-traffic and add any keyword phrase to my Squidoo Tags [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s two easy steps I do as a quick &#8220;freshness boost&#8221; for a lens about to slip past the bottom of its tier. It&#8217;s no substitute for adding new, updated, exciting content, but it&#8217;s a quick fix.</p>
<ol>
<li>In traffic stats, I<strong> change the window to 30-day-traffic </strong>and add any keyword phrase to my Squidoo Tags that&#8217;s been searched 4-5 times, if I haven&#8217;t got it already. This won&#8217;t help much with Google, which doesn&#8217;t put much stock in Squidoo tags, but it may help with MSN and Yahoo (once Yahoo rediscovers Squidoo). Don&#8217;t forget you need to PUBLISH a lens again after adding tags!</li>
<li>I make note of my chosen keywords and the top 2-3 searches for my lens. I then add each as alt-tags to one image on my lens, in a module talking about that topic, or a graphic that illustrates it.  I may even delete an image, change its filename on my computer to a better keyword (use hyphens to separate words, e.g. picture-of-stork.jpg), upload it again and change the HTML to point to the new filename. Both these methods are <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/upload-images#module19595122">using images to attract search engine traffic</a>.</li>
</ol>
<p>Voilá! Publish, and you&#8217;ve just updated your lens, which can give it a small ranking boost. Again, you can&#8217;t always cheat like this &#8212; sometimes you need to add new content! &#8212; but we can&#8217;t be rewriting all our lenses every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-tags-traffic-tip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Squidoo Dashboard: What Lens Stats Tell Us</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 07:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greekgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Squidoo Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lensrank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome back to the third and final segment of my “Lensrank secrets” study. In Part I we squeezed the Squidoo FAQ for every scrap of information it could tell us about lensrank. In Part II, we tackled the Squidoo Dashboard stats, on the theory that most of those factor into lensrank (the FAQ showed that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome back to the third and final segment of my “Lensrank secrets” study. In <a href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-lensrank-shiny-bumper/">Part I</a> we squeezed the Squidoo FAQ for every scrap of information it could tell us about lensrank. In Part II, we tackled the <a href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-lensrank-secrets/">Squidoo Dashboard</a> stats, on the theory that most of those factor into lensrank (the FAQ showed that many do). Whether or not they are all lensrank factors, they certainly give us a lot of clues about how to improve and promote our Squidoo lenses.</p>
<p>Now I’m going to finish up with an in-depth look at the “individual lens stats” part of the <strong>Squidoo Dashboard.</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-122"></span></p>
<h2><em>Squidoo Dashboard &#8211; Individual Lens Stats </em>- “Summary” Tab</h2>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-117" title="Squidoo Dashboard lens stats: Summary" src="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-summary.png" alt="Squidoo Dashboard lens stats: Summary" width="619" height="301" /></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Age</strong>: Do old lenses get a lensrank boost? Probably not; I can’t see any convincing reason for it, and Squidoo tends to encourage fresh and new content. <a href="http://www.domainnamenews.com/search-engines/domain-age-and-search-engine-positioning/1522">Microsoft</a> and <a href="http://www.jimboykin.com/google-filters/">Google</a> give some bonus to domain age, but I’ve only seen people who know even less than me speculating that webpage ages may help. Anyway, Squidoo itself is barely old enough to qualify for such a boost.  So just give yourself a pat on the back as lenses hit milestones.</li>
<li><strong>Ratings</strong>: As I said in the first part of my analysis of the <a href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-lensrank-secrets/">Squidoo Dashboard</a>, my guess is that Squidoo isn’t counting the actual<em> rating</em> of lenses, because most get zero, one or 5 stars. However, the FAQ mentioned “community ratings” as a factor, so I’m guessing they measure <em>number of ratings.</em> (We’ve also been told not to fret over one-star ratings, because they still boost lensrank. Thank you to whomever gave me a birthday present a day early by 3-starring (?!) a whole bunch of my lenses today! <img src='http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</li>
<li><strong>Lensrank: </strong>It’s not just an ego massage; lensrank serves several practical functions. Even if they’re not in the top 100, lenses get listed in order by lensrank when someone uses Squidoo search. So if your lens is top-ranked among lenses sharing its tags (and they are reasonably popular tags to search), then you’ve <em>search engine optimized</em> for a very particular search engine: <strong>Squidoo</strong>! Likewise, getting onto the <em>Top 100 List</em> for <em>any</em> category means it will get extra attention/clicks from people browsing Squidoo. Moreover, <em>all Top 100 Lists are indexed by search engines and give a small SEO boost, </em>whereas <em>Tags</em> pages are not.Say what? Here, a crash course in how search engines see Squidoo:
<ul>
<li>Visit a lens. Click on a tag in the sidebar. You&#8217;ll be taken to a page where all other pages with that tag are listed. If you have the <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/5687">NoFollow/DoFollow Firefox add-on</a>, it appears that Squidoo Tag pages <em>are</em> “followed” by search engine crawlers, which index the web by following links. But not so fast! If you check Squidoo’s <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/robots.txt">robots.txt</a> file, you’ll see that all pages in the<strong> /tag/</strong> directory are blocked from search engines. (Geeky geek stuff here, yes.) Whereas Top 100 pages, all filed under <strong>/browse/</strong>, are NOT blocked!  Lenses on Top 100 pages get a guaranteed visit by search engines.</li>
<li>Which means it’s worth your while to make lenses in less-popular categories. Don’t cheat, folks &#8212; mis-categorizing a lens means fewer human visitors will find it! But you might check out less popular categories and brainstorm lens ideas for them.</li>
<li>Oops, digression. Where were we? Ah yes, <strong>examining the “Summary” page of Squidoo lens stats. </strong><strong></strong></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Clickouts</strong>. One big measure of a page’s performance is whether people found something on it to click, or hit the “Go Back” button. This is what industry experts call <em>conversion:</em> turning web traffic into something you want the visitor to do.</li>
<li> Squidoo cares about four kinds of clickouts: Adsense/ad clickouts (ka-ching!), merchant clickouts (possible ka-ching!), clickouts to the rest of the web, and clickouts to other parts of Squidoo. According to a trusted lensmaster post I’m still trying to track down—Fluffanutta, was that you?!— directing traffic to other parts of Squidoo may get a bit more lensrank boost. After all, once you send people away, Squidoo gets no more benefit from them. Betcha “ka-ching” clicks (money-earning) carry more weight, though.<br />
(Suddenly I have this image of your readers as a volleyball, internal links as passing the volleyball back and forth around Squidoo, and Adsense and affiliate sales modules as the spike. Moving on&#8230;)</li>
<li>Number of times lens has been <strong>emailed</strong>. I have a strong hunch that this is one of those “lensmaster reputation” or “other factors” the FAQ mentions in breaking down the lensrank algorithm. Notice how Squidoo remembers <em>all </em>the times your lens has ever been emailed!</li>
<li>Number of times marked as <strong>Favorite</strong>. <span style="color: #ff6600;">It might be time to get Fluffanutta’s <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/lens-love-widget">Love This Lens widget</a> which compactly invites people to favorite, rate, email your lens&#8230; all things that probably or definitely boost lensrank</span>. Smart guy. (Get and use ALL his Squidoo tools, for that matter. They’re more useful than my yapping.)</li>
<li><strong>Days on Top 100 list</strong> <em>probably</em> isn’t factored into lensrank— although who knows!— but it’s a fun goal to shoot for.</li>
</ul>
<p>Below this header we have two timelines:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-129" title="Squidoo Dashbord: Summary Stats p.t 2" src="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/squidoo-dashboards-lenses2.png" alt="Squidoo Dashbord: Summary Stats p.t 2" width="500" height="356" />So, <strong>seven-day traffic</strong> isn’t all Squidoo cares about, anymore than we do. Ditto for <strong>lensrank</strong>. It’s possible that Squidoo may factor “average traffic”  or just “lifetime traffic” to lensrank, although if so, I doubt these are as important as big lensrank boosters like earnings,  (7-day) traffic, (30-day) clickthroughs. (The part in parentheses is the span which Squidoo records on the stats page, which I suspect is also the span Squidoo measures for lensrank calculations.)</p>
<h2><em>Squidoo Dashboard &#8211; Individual Lens Stats </em>- “Traffic” Tab</h2>
<p>This is, in my opinion, the nuts and bolts of what Squidoo is looking for: the vital signs of lens performance, which changes a lot from day to day (hence daily lensrank calculations).</p>
<p>At the top of the “Lens Traffic” page it repeats 7-day and lifetime Visitor Traffic. 7-day is again listed first. Maybe I’m reading too much into these stats, but I keep being struck by Squidoo’s “yesterday is so last week” attitude.</p>
<p>Then a bunch of charts come up. By default they’re 7-day, but when monitoring keywords I advise taking a look at 30-day windows to get a better sense of what keyword phrases are getting searched repeatedly.</p>
<p>Example <strong>Squidoo Dashboard Traffic Source</strong> charts:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-130" title="Squidoo Dashboard: Inbound and Outbound Links" src="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-traffic.png" alt="Squidoo Dashboard: Inbound and Outbound Links" width="500" height="434" /></p>
<p>Don’t you love Long Tail* searches? They make me laugh. This example also points to a “long tail chasing” secret: people often type the word <em>stuff</em> in searches.</p>
<p><em>*(Long Tail: less-popular searches that collectively outnumber popular searches. You can often get most of the traffic for a “long tail” search that no other webpage is optimized for, whereas popular searches are hard to dominate. A <a title="Graph of daily searches using word 'squid'" href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-stats/keyword-search-squid/">graph of search results for nearly any word</a> shows where the nickname“Long Tail” came from.)<br />
</em></p>
<p><em></em></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Incoming traffic: </strong>Remember SquidU’s thread about whether Squidoo used<a href="http://www.squidu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?id=32414"> backlinks as the biggest factor for lensrank</a>? Here’s why I doubt it. Squidoo stats don’t mention how many <em>inbound links</em> (one-way links pointing to your website) or <em>backlinks</em> (properly, reciprocal links between your page and another page) you’ve got. Instead it measures <em>traffic sources:</em> sources of traffic that sent actual visitors to your page. In other words, Squidoo measures performance, not potential.</li>
<li>The<strong> Traffic Source pie chart</strong> is careful to distinguish <em>each different kind of traffic source.</em> Do you have traffic from one search engine? Or several? What do you want to bet there’s a minute lensrank boost if you have a colorful “lots of sources” pie chart versus just one source? <span style="color: #ff6600;">In other words, it’s worth your while to have links from other parts of Squidoo and beyond it, from several search engines, and from your friends to whom you gave your business card with the URL on the back.</span></li>
<li><img src="file:///Users/ellen/Library/Caches/TemporaryItems/moz-screenshot.jpg" alt="" /><strong>Keyword searches </strong>measures exactly how many different searches landed on your page. Again, what do you want to bet that <em>lots of different searches</em> may give a lensrank boost? It’s worth your while to learn how search engines other than Google work. (<span style="color: #ff6600;">See my “SEO” tab up top— I’ve got links to a couple articles discussing optimization for Yahoo and MSN</span>.)</li>
<li>The<strong> Keyword Tool</strong> (little plus signs on the chart above) encourages you to add commonly-searched phrases to your lens tags. I’m of several minds about this. Because of the Tags page being Nofollow), Squidoo tags don’t give you any <em>link building</em> SEO juice— see Fluffanutta’s rant about “<a href="http://squidutils.com/blog/lens-building/squidoo-tags-have-no-seo-effect">Squidoo Tags Have No SEO Benefit</a>”. And Google doesn’t treat Squidoo tags as any more significant, for search optimization purposes, than any other link text. However, it turns out that Yahoo and MSN <em>do</em> consider your tags to be extra-important parts of your page, and they’ll boost your page higher on searches for those terms! So I use <a href="http://spirituality.squidtop.com/2009/01/12/seo-review-weight-loss-lens-pulled-apart/">broad, general terms for my Squidoo tags as Spirituality recommends</a>, at least at first, but later add recurring “long tail searches” that keep popping up. (Fluffanutta says Squidoo’s “health check tool” likes no more than 10-15 Squidoo tags, and sometime I need to find out whether there’s a good reason for that limit).</li>
<li>Note the <strong>Direct</strong> category of incoming traffic. This is people’s own bookmarks, clicking on a link in email, or any source of traffic that didn’t start out on a traceable webpage.  (People using online webmail get filed under Referral, not Direct). I suspect <strong>Direct </strong>traffic is factored into the “lensmaster reputation” or “other factors” lensrank boost mentioned by the FAQ. If someone likes your site enough to come to it personally, that’s gotta count for something. So <span style="color: #ff6600;">email your friends your best lenses</span>!</li>
</ul>
<p>Below these two charts we’ve got a much more detailed breakdown of <strong>Referrers:</strong></p>
<p><strong><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-131" title="Squidoo Dashboard: Referrers" src="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-referrers.png" alt="Squidoo Dashboard: Referrers" width="649" height="219" /></strong></p>
<p>The gray box only appears if you click on a referrer’s domain name. I’m going to hazard a guess that <em>the number of different domains sending you traffic</em> is counted for lensrank in addition to <em>number of<br />
</em></p>
<ul>
<li>Finally, we’ve got the “conversion” part of the Stats page: <strong>Clickouts</strong> (often called clickthroughs). All clickthroughs are listed together: to other sites, to other parts of Squidoo, to adsense ads, to merchant modules. So I think we’re looking at a straight lensrank factor here: Total number of clickouts. <em>Possibly</em> with an extra boost for clickouts on several different links on your lens, instead of just ten clicks on just one. <span style="color: #ff6600;">Bottom line, <em>tempt your visitors to click. </em></span>Preferably on links to lenses you’ve made that are closely related to your topic, using link text that fits your page’s keywords, to help with SEO.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Last but by no means least, you’ve got the <strong>Royalties</strong> tab, which I personally wish were named the Commissions tab. This tracks all the commissions you’ve gotten from people buying stuff through your Amazon and eBay modules. I think you’ll also see Cafepress commissions pop up there. We know from the FAQ that<em> Revenue boosts lensrank. </em>Each time you make a sale, lensrank goes up. I’ve not seen any relationship between amount of sale and lensrank boost, but I’ve only got a small sample size.</li>
</ul>
<h2>And That’s IT.</h2>
<p>There are three <strong>Squidoo Dashboard Tabs</strong> I’m ignoring here: <strong>Comments, My Groups, My Profile, My Favorites.</strong></p>
<p>However, other than my guess that you may get a slight lensrank boost for answering comments, these tabs don’t have much in the way of data relevant to measuring lens performance. I seriously doubt Squidoo rewards you for adding a lens to more or less groups, though you’ll get another benefit — backlinks — thereby.</p>
<p>In closing, I’d just like to remind you to check your profile to make sure you’ve filled in as many blank slots you can: blogs, favorite lenses on this and that, any opportunity you can get to pass a little link juice to some of your lenses.. Change your featured lenses from time to time, to keep your bio fresh and to distribute traffic and backlink love to different lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lensrank Secrets Right Under Your Nose</title>
		<link>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-lensrank-secrets/</link>
		<comments>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-lensrank-secrets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 18:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Greekgeek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How Squidoo Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dashboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lensrank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my last post I dissected the Squidoo FAQ to squeeze out every bit of official information about lensrank. There&#8217;s another possible source of official lensrank information right under our noses: the Squidoo Dashboard. I submit, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, that Squidoo is not expending great gobs of computing and hosting power calculating [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my last post I dissected the Squidoo FAQ to squeeze out every bit of <a href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-lensrank-shiny-bumper/">official information about lensrank</a>.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s another possible source of official lensrank information right under our noses: the <strong>Squidoo Dashboard</strong>. I submit, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, that Squidoo is not expending great gobs of computing and hosting power calculating and storing lens stats for our sole benefit. Most of these stats measure factors alluded to in the FAQ. I suspect that most if not <em>all</em> of our Squidoo Dashboard stats are lensrank factors. We don’t know which carry the most weight, and the lensrank algorithm changes from time to time, but dashboard stats tell us a lot about what Squidoo, at least, thinks is important for an effective webpage.</p>
<p>So let’s dig deeper and see what the Squidoo Dashboard has to tell us.</p>
<p><span id="more-109"></span></p>
<p>First (although many of us forget, since we set the “Lenses” tab as default), there’s the dashboard’s <strong>Daily Digest</strong>:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-112" title="Squidoo Dashboard Daily Digest" src="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/daily-digest.jpg" alt="Squidoo Dashboard Daily Digest" width="634" height="441" /></p>
<h2><em>Squidoo Dashboard &#8211; Daily Digest</em> Analysis:</h2>
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>Squidoo is always pushing us to make<strong> more lenses</strong>. The Giant Squid program (mentioned below this header) is one way they push, and you’ll see others if you read the <a href="http://blogs.squidoo.com/squidblog/">Squid Blog</a>. It’s not hard to guess why: every lens is another tentacle for catching web traffic, another source of SEO-worthy links to other parts of Squidoo, and another source of ad revenue. The message is: <span style="color: #ff6600;">Get WIPs featured; fine-tune them later.</span></li>
<li><strong>Traffic</strong> is the second thing mentioned— not just <em>any </em>traffic, but <em>seven day</em> traffic. Which means, if you’re lazy and pragmatic like I am, you may not want to do much social bookmarking when you first publish a lens. You’ve already got the “brand new lens” freshness boost, so just draw a <em>little </em>traffic to it via Twitter, an announcement in SquidU forum, pinging with <a href="http://www.squidutils.com">SquidUtils</a>, activating the Discovery Tool, and your signature. Optimize for search engines and do enough to get indexed, but <span style="color: #ff6600;">don’t worry about capturing every traffic source at launch. Instead, save most social promotion for when lensrank starts to drop</span>. Each social promotion method may produce a flurry of new visitors. If one seems to be working, hold off a few days before pulling the trigger on the next.<br />
(On the other hand, this may be a short-sighted way of looking at it. Boosting lensrank is usually not your primary goal; gaining traffic and <em>conversions — </em>clickthroughs, sales, or whatever you want visitors to get out of your webpage — is usually goal #1. You’ll have to weigh the benefits of “traffic from the start” vs. “new bursts of traffic arriving later”. Either way, temporary bursts of traffic are exactly that, temporary, so you’ll want to balance short-term and long-term methods of <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/build-web-traffic">building web traffic</a>.)</li>
<li><strong>Earnings</strong> (commissions from <a title="Guide to Squidoo merchant modules and which earn commssions" href="http://www.squidoo.com/squidoo-modules-selling-stuff">Squidoo modules that “sell stuff”</a>) are mentioned as lensrank factors on the FAQ. Based on personal experience, I’d say they’re one of the biggest factors. I’ve seen my most dramatic lensrank jumps from sales.<br />
Caveat: That may be due to the fact that I don’t target or get many sales on my “selling stuff” modules. People often think the “biggest lensrank factor” is the one they’ve under-utilized in the past, because “new” sources of lensrank boost can cause a big jump. And on the third hand, I think lensrank factors are strongly weighted by the following rule of thumb: if it helps Squidoo grow and prosper, chances are, it will be rewarded by Squidoo!</li>
<li><strong>Pending Comments</strong> may simply be a useful reminder for us. But the last thing the FAQ mentioned as a lensrank factor was “<em>curated”</em> lenses. Perhaps one indication of “curated” is not<em> how many comments</em> we get, but <em>when we last attended to them, </em>or maybe <em>how often</em><em>.</em> I certainly saw a huge lensrank jump when I came back from a several-month hiatus and cleared out my comments queue, although that may have been because I edited all those lenses. It would take carefully-controlled testing to determine whether comment moderating actually impacts lensrank and how. I simply raise the possibility.</li>
<li>Below my screencap, four blocks on the page focus on two stats: the<strong> top and least trafficked</strong> lenses, and the <strong>freshest and most stale</strong>. Traffic, freshness, and number of lenses get emphasized again and again. I would not be surprised if the top four lensrank factors were: recent traffic, time since last update, pending earnings, and clickthroughs, with<em> frequency of updates </em>factored in separately.</li>
<li>Finally, there<strong>’s a reminder about the Giant Squid program </strong>(even if you’re a giant Squid). This reminds us that <strong>number of lenses</strong> (also mentioned at the top) counts— but only after the Giant Squid quality control program makes sure you don’t have buckets of junk lenses. So, <em>once you’ve passed a human screening, </em>“lots of lenses” gives your lenses a lensrank boost. Making the Giants 100 Club earns an additional “lots of lenses” boost. Therefore: <span style="color: #ff6600;">make lots of lenses, but make sure they’re good</span>, then <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/giantsquids">apply for Giant Squid-dom</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h2><em>Squidoo Dashboard &#8211; Lenses Tab</em> Analysis:</h2>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-124" title="Squidoo Dashboard: Lenses Stats" src="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-lenses.png" alt="Squidoo Dashboard: Lenses Stats" width="530" height="188" /></p>
<p>So much for <strong>Daily Digest. </strong>Turning to the <strong>Lenses</strong> tab where most of us do our stats obsessing, we get: <strong>Rank, Rating, Visits, $$$, Edited.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The FAQ mentions “community <strong>ratings</strong>” first, and they’re the first thing on the dashboard. Number of stars may not be very significant; I suspect the “number of stars” count is a legacy of early Squidoo, when they hoped people would be more selective about rating lenses from 0 to 5 instead of 0, 1 OR 5! However, I note that on individual lens stats, <em>number of ratings</em> is also recorded. As as I mentioned in the last post, there are a lot of clues that Squidoo hunts for and will<em> </em>suspend<em> </em>people found manipulating ratings. That tells me that “community ratings” are still very important, even if the exact number of stars may no longer count for much. So if you want to boost lensrank, <span style="color: #ff6600;">add a friendly reminder to visitors to rate your lens.</span></li>
<li>I’m skipping over <strong>Visits</strong> because we obsess over traffic too much, except to remind confused newbies that it’s a 7-day summary of your most recent traffic,  <em>not</em> a cumulative count of all past and recent traffic.</li>
<li><strong>$$$ </strong>again reminds us that whether we earn through third party affiliate marketing or don’t care about money, Squidoo’s got to consider the bottom line. <span style="color: #ff6600;">Boost your lensrank by pointing your visitors to intriguing Amazon or other e-commerce modules and using personal recommendation to make the sale.</span></li>
<li><strong>Edited</strong> pushes us to keep “curating” our lenses. The FAQ has said <em>frequency</em> of updates is important, and we have also got a lot of evidence that<em> time elapsed since last update</em> is important. I’ve heard but not confirmed that there are “lensrank drops” at certain fixed intervals, e.g.  30 days since last update, 60 days since last update. Remember you can click the top of a column to sort lenses by that statistic. That makes it easy to <span style="color: #ff6600;">find and update stale lenses.</span></li>
</ul>
<h2>S<em>quidoo Dashboard &#8211; “Stats” Tab</em> Analysis</h2>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-125" title="Squidoo Dashboard Stats Tab" src="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-stats.png" alt="Squidoo Dashboard Stats Tab" width="466" height="260" /></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Individual Lens Stats</strong>. We’ll examine these in more depth in the next section.</li>
<li><strong>Earnings</strong>. The bottom line. Bookkeeping between us and Squidoo for our records and theirs. Could historical earnings data for lenses have any bearing on current lensrank? Maybe not; Squidoo has to record this stuff for other reasons.</li>
<li><strong>Referrals</strong>. On the one hand, referrals from a lens may give it a small lensrank boost. On the other hand, in two years and dozens of referrals, I’ve yet to see any referral translate into earnings (I’ve heard a similar complaint from a lensmaster with hundreds of referrals). You would be the apple of Squidoo’s eye and stand to gain bonus money if you could figure out why so few referrals translate into actual earning and contributing lensmasters (most never make a single lens). You might check referrals’ bios from time to time and give encouragement to them, although I confess I’ve only done that once or twice (and then found most had not filled in profiles or contact info).</li>
</ul>
<p>Last but by no mean<em>s least, each lens has three </em><em>pages of individual lens Stats.</em></p>
<p>But this post is getting so long I’m going to break it into 3 parts. Okay? Okay. Stay tuned for <strong><a href="http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-dashboard-stats/">Squidoo Dashboard Secrets Continued</a>.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://greekgeek.mythphile.com/2009/04/squidoo-lensrank-secrets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
