Squidbits – Greekgeek's Squidoo Blog Rotating Header Image

affiliate-marketing

If the Nexus Tax Killed Your Amazon Associate Account

... you can change your Amazon Associates links on Squidoo to Squidoo's Amazon associates ID instead, and then get at least some commission. You know the drill: Squidoo collects about 8.5% commission due to its high volume, then pays us half of that, so you'll be making less than before (assuming you were making 6% or more). But at least it's something.

Flynn got on the ball before I did and wrote a Tutorial on How to Change Amazon Associate Links to Use Squidoo's ID. Obviously, this will only work on Squidoo, which means "eggs in one basket" syndrome all over again, and we're screwed if Amazon shuts down its New York program (where Squidoo is based).

California Lawmakers Reduce Income Tax Revenue, Kill Jobs with Misguided NEXUS Tax

Here we go. California's just-passed budget includes the infamous NEXUS tax, which attempts to force online merchants to collect sales tax in any state where a single affiliate marketer -- someone who gets a tiny commission for the sale -- is present. Supporters of this nose-cutting, face-spiting tax claim it will bring in $200 million dollars in sales tax revenue.

Really? Haven't they been paying ANY attention at all? Does nobody in Sacramento read the writing on the wall? Whenever a state has passed a law like this, Amazon and other online merchants have had a simple solution: they shut down the affiliate program in that state. Amazon doesn't really need affiliate marketers that much; it's making a tidy profit anyway!

The victims of this will be Californians.  By throwing down the gauntlet, the state legislature has encouraged Amazon and other online retailers to shut down their affiliate programs. If that happens-- and  Amazon has indicated it will happen, just as it has in many other states -- here's the fallout:

  • No income tax will be collected, so the law's goal will fail.
  • It will kill part-time (or even full-time) jobs for thousands of Californians.
  • It will eliminate millions of dollars of income for Californians, who will thus pay less income tax.
  • It will eliminate the "buffer funds" of thousands of Californians who were using that money to fund shopping, trips, leisure activities like going to the movies or catching a game, or pay bills. This means less sales tax collected than before, by the way.
  • It will put more pressure on one segment of the population: seniors, young people, work at home spouses, and those with health problems which make it difficult to work 9 to 5 jobs. Many of these were finding affiliate marketing an effective way to work and earn money from home.
  • It will cut back on sales of products made by Californian businesses selling their products on Amazon and getting the benefit of free marketing.

Way to go, California state legislature! You may have just killed thousands of jobs and lost your state coffers and local businesses millions of dollars!

 

Recommended Link: Why California's Nexus Tax is a Lose, Lose, Lose situation for Californians, the state of California, and Amazon (and why the only winner in all this is, basically, Wal-Mart, which lobbied hard for this law)

Captain Obvious on Amazon Referrals

Most of you are much farther along than me in this whole Amazon Associates thing, which I only started doing systematically last holiday shopping season. I'm just overhauling a massive product catalog lens (a whole series of collectibles which I used to have divided up by page breaks), consolidating it and re-checking all the Amazon Associates links. Things I'm checking:

  • Affiliate links are nofollowed
  • All the links point to the right product (duh)
  • The associates id is in every link
  • Correct product image
  • 4 or 5 star rating on the Amazon product page
  • Reviews on the Amazon product page won't give a potential buyer cold feet (if many reviews point out major problems with the product, this may not be a good product to recommend)
  • If there's multiple Amazon listings, look for one with a "Buy" button on the right rather than "available from these sellers"
  • The Amazon product page has a reasonable price

My basic template right now is

[Thumbnail Product Image linked to Amazon listing]
[2-lines of captions under image in 9-point type:]

Photos: [Link1] [Link2]   | Video [linked to video review, if there is one]
[Amazon Link]  [Link to eBay module at bottom of page]

Paragraph: My own comments and review. Blah blah blah blah blah...

Links/quick blurb on other, similar items for comparison.

 

Instead of taking other people's photos (bad!) I include links to their pages, but use the Amazon Associates image for the thumbnail on my own lens. Of course, if I link to another page for photos, that page must (a) have the photos near the top (b) not have anything offensive on it and (c) not be selling the product. For collectibles, at least, you'll often find a ton of "look at my cool toy!" photos on Flickr and video reviews on YouTube.

Since eBay modules tend to load more slowly, I put them at the bottom of the page as an appendix, with a link pointing down there; they'll have loaded in by the time visitors get far enough to look at them. This is only necessary if you've got an older lens with more eBay modules than the 5 we're limited to nowadays.

Act Now, or We May Lose Our Affiliate Income

ALERT! Will we lose our Amazon and other affiliate income? We might. Many already have.

[Originally posted in SquidU]

In several U.S. states, Amazon has shut down its associates program, in response to new laws passed attempting to collect sales tax from affiliate marketers or internet commerce. I'm guessing that the cost of recordkeeping for so many individual accounts and/or paying sales tax on such minute amounts eats too much of the profits to be worth the trouble.

Most recently, Colorado associates got shut down, following Hawaii, North Carolina, and Rhode Island. Read that link for more info.

Alarmingly, I'm reading old -- or new? -- news that New York State has instituted such a law, and the only thing holding it back is an appeal filed by Amazon. Here's a New York Times editorial about it, expressing the opinion that Amazon should lose.

On the one hand, states have the right to tax sales that go on in their states.

On the other hand, every time Amazon shuts down an affiliate program, it's not Amazon who gets shafted. it's us. The affiliate marketers. The folks trying to pay bills. The folks trying to make ends meet.

Any of us could be victims of these new state laws, which could take away our Amazon or other affiliate earnings.

Some of our friends and Squidoo members have already gotten burned by this: they've lost their associate accounts because Amazon's pulled the plug in their states.

And it could happen in New York, where Squidoo is based.

I don't know what would happen then, but I don't like the prospect.

That New York Times editorial shows that most people think this is just going to impact Amazon's bottom line. All they see is big bad Amazon getting a tax break while competing with small businesses. They don't realize that millions of families and small businesses make money on Amazon through affiliate commissions. I'm sure legislators don't have a clue.

So I think that we should use some of our marketing and writing skills to write EVERY SINGLE state legislator and congressperson, and tell them the other side of the story, which they're probably not hearing: yours and mine.

Write your state representative. Write your congressperson. Today.

This is more important for your online livelihood than any Tweet, Facebook status update, blog post or other page you do all this month... maybe all year.

I'm not sure what arguments one can use to counterbalance, "we need the sales tax to pay off our looming debts." But how about, "Amazon will just shut down their associates program in states where the cost of running it is too costly -- they already have in HI, RI and CO -- so you're not going to get that money anyway. But Amazon Associates pay income taxes, so if they get shut down, you LOSE revenue, not to mention killing people's jobs, income, and buying power."

Share this post. Spread the word.

On Squidoo Success Stories

With the biggest payout yet for many people -- including me! -- and the end of the year, Squidoo members are pondering Squidoo success stories...and failures.

MikeEssex created a Squidoo Success Stories lens reporting on the real-life successes of several members, plus links to stats and earnings lenses by many members who maintain lenses or blogs to track their Squidoo progress. (Here's mine.)

In response, three-year Squidoo member SisterCaren wrote a tongue-in-cheek lens which I think is just as important: her Squidoo Failure Story. She shares tips and insights on what doesn't work.

We need to know about both Squidoo successes and Squidoo failures. I included both when I created my "Is Squidoo a Scam?" lens several years ago. I also demonstrated (I hope) that success on Squidoo can be defined in many different ways: traffic, successful promotion of a blog, business, or cause, moneymaking, gaining an online following.

However, there is one way that most Squidoo members and the rest of the world define success: earnings.  And Kimberly's announcement on 12/16 that ONE member earned $2000K for the month through Squidoo earnings alone is a story of  both success and failure at the same time.

(more...)

Lens Review: EditorDave's Lens on Guam

I wasn't planning to do lens reviews on this blog, but spouting about my own stuff all the time could get dreary. So why not use someone else’s lens as an example of a good use of Squidoo?

When you find a lens you like, ask yourself: WHY do you like it? You can get insights about building good lenses, articles, and blog posts by jotting down what on that lens worked for you, what didn't. Don’t copy their content (please!), but learn approaches to presenting your own content in more effective ways.

Here is EditorDave's Guam: Where America's Day Begins lens.

(more...)