Squidbits – Greekgeek's Squidoo Blog Rotating Header Image

linkbuilding

Rel="me" Rel="author" UPDATE for Squidoo lensmasters

I just got a note from Gil on my Rel="author" Squidoo tutorial. (Thanks, Gil!)

The slots on our Squidoo Profile for "other profiles" (Facebook, Twitter, MySpace) are now labeled with rel="me" automatically. So is the "My Blog" slot.

More importantly, Squidoo has now added a slot on our lensmaster profile for a link to "Google Plus" (which will work just fine for a regular Google profile account as well). This link is automatically marked with rel="me" in the code.

Therefore, in order to connect your Squidoo lenses to your Google profile, the process is now:

  1. Create a Google Profile
  2. Edit your Google Profile, add a link to your Squidoo Lensmaster Page in the "Other Profiles" box
  3. View your Google profile and copy its URL
  4. On Squidoo, go to My Settings > Profile, scroll down, and paste your Google Profile URL into the "Google Plus" box
  5. Save, and you're done!
(You don't have to fuss with rel="author" at all, because the bio box in the upper right corner of lenses automatically creates rel="author" from each lens to your lensmaster profile page.)

P.S. Remember those slots in our Squidoo Profile that we haven't been able to access since the Dashboard update? They're editable again!

Three notes on Rel="me", Rel="author" (They work!)

EDIT: DRAT. I spoke too soon. Google has changed how rel="author" works, and try as I might, I can no longer get it to recognize authorship with Squidoo pages. Or at least, Google's snippet validator isn't recognizing it.

-----

 

Three notes on rel="me" and rel="author," which I talked about last month.

  • It WORKS with an ordinary Google Profile, as opposed to a Google+ profile, if you're annoyed with Google+ for various reasons. Here's a screenshot of some Google results showing my author icon, linked to an ordinary Google account not Google Plus. (Alll the way at the bottom, but at least it draws the eye). Ignore the cache on the right... or don't, because as you see, it's one more way users may decide whether or not to visit your page:

Notice how the author icon  makes my link stand out from other text links on the same page, although perhaps I ought to create and add a "how to" YouTube video  as well to see if I can land in that section of Google results.

  • Your author icon will not appear next to your claimed content immediately. Over time, more and more content pages are showing my author icon. For search results that do not show my authorship icon, my author name is not listed either. This suggests that the author icon appears next to authored content AFTER it is re-crawled. 

Therefore, to get the author icon to show up on your older articles, edit and tweak the content, and PING them (on Squidoo, get SquidUtils' Workshop Add-on and then click "ping" on the SU link that appears in the "Just published" page. Or just wait. Google re-crawls everything eventually.

Haven't implemented rel=me on Squidoo yet? Here's that tutorial again.

  • Thirdly, Google has CHANGED the way links are listed on your Google Profile. They've now been divided into "Other Profiles," "Contributor to" and "Recommended Links." The first one, "Other Profiles," is obviously where you put your Squidoo, Wizzley, Twitter, Facebook and other social media accounts. But what about blogs? I tried moving my blog-links to "Contributor to," and it dropped rel="me"  and tagged those links with rel="contributor-to" instead. That doesn't seem right. I'm still trying to figure out where one files blogs.

I think, perhaps, the best thing to do would be to create an Author Profile page on each blog where you are an author, set the other pages/entries on the site to point to that profile page with rel="author," and set up reciprocal rel="me" links between the author profile and your Google profile. In other words, mimic the rel="author" and rel="me" setup that I've suggested with Squidoo, which we know works (see screencap above). But I haven't implemented this yet, so I'm not sure I'm right. Why is it so bally complicated? Well, I'm sure we'll be doing it with our eyes closed just like basic HTML in a few years.

Claim Authorship of Your Content on Google

Claiming authorship of your unique, original content could help your content rank better in Google, if Google determines that you generally write good content. It also might help Google find your new content faster, since it will check your author profile (lensmaster profile) from time to time. Most importantly, if you establish yourself as the author of content in Google's eyes, it will privilege the original content above that of scrapers.

The downside is that while HTML has a mechanism for you to establish your content linked to any username, Google will only recognize your authorship if you link it to a Google profile including your real name and a photo. This is a serious problem for millions of web users who have privacy concerns, especially minors and women who are sometimes targets of stalkers.

But if you already have a Google+ account, and/or you're willing to take the risk, here's what to do:

How to claim authorship with
rel="author" and rel="me" : a Squidoo Tutorial

I did this at the beginning of September, and saw my traffic spike across most of my lenses. See my Squidoo Stats for the week of Sep 4-10, showing my weekly traffic jumping from about 12,500 to 15,000, and this chart of my top 25 lenses by lensrank:

 

Traffic increase a week and a half after implementing rel="author"

 

I wish I knew whether these traffic spikes were coincidence or significant. I did not see similar almost-across-the-board traffic increases from other search engines; some were up and some were down. If you're an established web author with a lot of good content on the web, I'm curious to know whether you've seen similar results after a week or two of hooking up your content to your Google profile with rel="author" and rel="me".

 

 

 

 

 

Multiple Backlinks from One Zazzle Store

NoFollow backlinks aren't that useful, but people and Google do follow them. (Yes, Google does follow NoFollow Links, and in fact counts them a tiny bit for Pagerank.)

Also, it's possible that search engines may take notice of how many different domains link to a page. We don't know, but it's no more foolish counting backlink diversity than counting backlinks with no idea which of those backlinks are actually weighted as relevant to a particular search.

In that context, I was intrigued to discover through SquidUtils' Backlink Checker that when you build a shop on Zazzle.com, it propagates on Zazzle.co.uk, Zazzle.de, Zazzle.fr and Zazzle.pt. (Where's that?) Now, links in Zazzle descriptions are nofollow, so the backlink on my Mythphile Shop is not passing much pagerank.

Google is probably sophisticated enough to realize those multiple domains are not totally independent: they're obviously part of an international network of sites. Also, it sees the duplicate content. (I think the duplicate content scare triggered by Panda has set off a bit of hysteria... a few mirror sites won't send your content off the Google SERPs, it's just they may not rank quite as well, or maybe only one will rank well in each country. Oops, tangent.) Nevertheless, those links have to count as least as much as forum signature links, which Google is also sophisticated enough to recognize as (a) self-promotion, not an unbiased recommendation and (b) a forum signature -- multiple posts with it shouldn't be weighted any more, or much more, than a single post.

All of this means that you might as well open a Zazzle shop, if you've got some visual assets related to your niche.

What kind of assets?

Have you taken your own digital photos related to your topic? Are they photographs of public landmarks, nature, or out-of-copyright (pre-1920 should be safe) products or images? (See this "Legal Pitfalls of Using Photographs" copyright FAQ for more info on what's allowed.) Commercially-licensed Creative Commons images are also permissible, with credit and a backlink.

Consider making postcards or small prints with them. (Don't be misleading and print ordinary-sized images on a poster when the original picture is 600x800 pixels; it'll look awful blown up to poster-size.) Write keyword-rich descriptions. And tie it in somehow to your topic, as I did with my Mythphile Shop. Plant the backlink. It's not much link juice, but it's a little. It's worth expanding your online assets and footprint while creating a possible venue for money-earning.

(This is where I plug my Zazzle tutorial.) Anyway, it's a thought.

 

Mormon Search Engine Optimization

Wow. You learn something every day. This post got long, so I turned it into a Hub:

The Church of Latter-Day SEO

SEO basics and ethical questions raised by the Church of Latter-Day Saints' grass-roots SEO campaign.

Are Squidoo Tag Pages Dead, Or Just Different?

Katinka has raised some important interlinking questions about how recent changes at Squidoo are impacting SEO of our lenses. We don't have all the answers -- are these changes temporary or permanent? -- but I've been pondering interlinking alternatives.

One important method of interlinking on Squidoo is, or was, Squidoo tags.

Fluff explained how Squidoo tag pages work on his SquidUtils blog back in '09. Squidoo tags sit in our lens sidebar and point to a tags page. For example, here's Squidoo's lenses on pirate costumes. That tags page lists all the lenses sharing that tag, including a brief excerpt of the introduction of each lens. If all the lenses are relevant to a topic, and their introduction text reinforces that topic, then, presumably, the tags page acts as a relevant backlink.  But if it's an orphaned tag shared by few or no other lenses, then the tag page may not matter much: it looks really empty, and I don't see much relevant link juice.

In the past, I've occasionally seen Squidoo tag pages appear in Google search results.

But now...

(more...)

Woo Hoo, Another "Squidoo Surprise"!

Hopefully this is a bug and not a feature.

Katinka / Spirituality reports in a SquidU post that the My Lenses / Featured Lenses modules which many of us use to inter-link our lenses are no longer indexed by Google. This would prevent duplicate content from showing up -- namely, the 150 character excerpt of each lens' introduction -- but also severs cross-links, hampering SEO.

You can verify the missing modules for yourself, as I just did, by Googling the following on a lens with a Featured Lenses module:

cache:http://www.squidoo.com/yourlens

replacing the URL above with a lens URL. This will show you exactly what part of the page Google has indexed and knows about. At the moment, the Featured Lenses module just isn't there.

We don't yet know whether this is a deliberate Squidoo design change or a bug introduced during recent upgrades. Katinka's passed this news onto Fluff, who isn't a Squidoo employee, but sometimes works with Squidoo on a volunteer basis to bug hunt.

So for now, we sit tight.

The reason this matters is that Featured Lenses / My Lenses modules were easy ways to cross-link lenses, allowing search engines to find new pages on Squidoo very quickly through links on existing pages. These cross-links were backlinks, hopefully backlinks from related content to related content, if you used them to point to lenses in the same niche / topic.

IF -- big if -- this is a new, permanent "feature," it means we'll have to do yet another workaround, hand-coding cross links to other related content so that we don't lose backlinks. The basic HTML code for doing this, which most of you know, is:

<a href="http://www.squidoo.com/example">Clickable text goes here</a>

I will also shameless plug some handy tutorials I've written, my old Make a Fancy Table of Contents tutorial for making compact, elegant-looking navigation bars and menus, and the Fancy Featured Lenses module trick I've ben using lately for lensographies such as my  index of all my graphics tutorials.

Or... once, long ago, when the Featured Lenses Module only let us enter 5 modules and displayed its contents in a random order rather than letting us pick the order of lenses, I figured out how to mimic the Featured Lenses Module's appearance precisely in a text module.

So there's several alternatives for cross-linking purposes. And as Katinka noted, cross-linking through Squidoo tags still works.

Let's sit tight for a few days until we know for sure whether this change is permanent, before we revamp all our lenses to address the problem.

The Most Powerful Way to Get Clickouts

I've had a lens that's been driving me nuts. My Aligning Images tutorial was getting 500, 600, now 700-800 visitors a week, but it was always tier 2. Why?

Simple. People read tutorials, and then they leave. No clickouts means no tier one for you. I had included links to a free HTML editor and various other resources, and still, the fish weren't biting.

I changed one graphic which I had created for my How to Get More Clicks, Sales tutorial. I didn't really expect it to make that much of a difference.

Kapow. Tier one, baby. You can offer people freebies, useful resources, and printables on a silver platter, but they may not click. You need good clip art to get the clicks. (My favorite two are OpenClipart and clker.com.)

That, or everyone is too curious when they see a random URL of a YouTube video not to check it out.

I'd think that's a joke, except that I've seen a similar "What's in the box? I have to poke it!" effect when I use the Amazon module in thumbnail mode. Normally, people are less likely to click on small images than large ones. But if it's a "what the heck IS that thing?!" type graphic, they click, because they want a closer look. Sometimes they buy it. More often they buy something else. Or, maybe, they don't buy, but at least you scored a clickout!

I've seen a similar phenomenon on bizarre images with humorous captions that are slightly too small to read. Demotivational posters on Zazzle are very effective for clicks.

But of course, the most powerful way to get clickouts isn't a killer, you've-just-got-to-click graphic.

The key is that you have to link to the Extreme Shepherding video.

The Snowflake Method of SEO

Challenge Lens Status: 3,983 on Oct 17, up from 84,121 on Oct 10

I'd like to talk about the Snowflake Method of lensbuilding, based on the Snowflake Method of fiction-writing (which is a good lesson on how to write content). Your lens topic is the kernel of a snowflake. Like the grain of dust a snowflake forms around, that core idea, its focus, will determine the shape of what's to come, along with weather and moisture (competition and search popularity) and other external factors.

You can't control external factors. But you can control what's inside.

A healthy lens needs six things:

  • Focused, useful, interesting content.
  • Organization and a logical flow from one section to the next.
  • Graphics and visual appeal (CSS, varying text with visual elements).
  • Strong writing: good grammar and spelling; compelling, crisp text.
  • Avenues for conversion: links to click, things to buy, or another action you're directing your visitors towards.

(more...)

Which Backlinks Count for SEO?

This is  a huge question. Different tools find different backlinks. For example, checking my Free Web Graphics -- How to Get Them (Legally!) lens on SquidUtils' Backlink Checker, I get this:

This URL has 1000+ links from 6 domains.

  • angelfire.com 1
  • annbrundigestudio.com 20
  • digg.com 1
  • mythphile.com 25
  • squidu.com 952
  • squidutils.com 1

(Once again demonstrating the  limitations of social media for SEO, since the links from StumbleUpon, Del.ici.ous. Tagfoot and others don't show up.)

1000+ backlinks is pretty good, right? Well, yeah, assuming (a) all search engines see the same backlinks as Yahoo Site Explorer (the database SquidUtils uses), and (b) all search engines count those links as relevant. But of course, they don't.

(more...)